Everything about Constitution Party United States totally explained
The
Constitution Party is a
conservative United States political party. It was founded as the
U.S. Taxpayers Party in 1992. The party's official name was changed to the
Constitution Party in 1999; however, some state affiliate parties are known under different names.
According to ballot access expert
Richard Winger, the editor of
Ballot Access News, who periodically compiles and analyzes voter registration statistics as reported by state voter agencies, it ranks third nationally amongst all United States
political parties in registered voters, with 366,937 registered members as of November 2006.
The Constitution Party advocates a platform that purports to reflect the
Founding Fathers'
original intent of the
U.S. Constitution, principles found in the
U.S. Declaration of Independence, and morals taken from the
Bible..
In 2006,
Rick Jore of
Montana became the first Constitution Party candidate elected to a state-level office, though the Constitution Party of Montana had disaffiliated itself from the national party a short time before the election.
On April 26, 2008,
Chuck Baldwin was elected to be the Constitution Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2008 election.
Affiliates and other similar parties
The
Michigan affiliate has kept the U.S. Taxpayers Party name to retain
ballot status.
In
Connecticut the affiliate is the
Concerned Citizens Party; in
Nebraska the affiliate has recently changed its name from "The
Nebraska Party" to "The
Nebraska Independent Party".
In
California, the affiliate is the
American Independent Party and in
Nevada it's the
Independent American Party.
It has been rumored that the Constitution Party discussed a merger between several third parties such as the
Reform Party,
Independent American Party,
American Independent Party, and the
America First Party, but others have rebutted this as a misinterpretation of the events. All of the aforementioned parties except for the Reform Party endorsed
Michael Peroutka as their presidential candidate in
2004.
Notable persons
Pat Buchanan threatened in 1996 to run as the U.S. Taxpayers Party candidate if
Bob Dole chose a
pro-choice running mate — Dole ultimately chose
pro-life Jack Kemp and received Buchanan's endorsement. Buchanan's 2000 Reform Party
running mate Ezola B. Foster switched to the Constitution Party in 2002. Buchanan stated on the September 7, 2004 edition of
Hardball with Chris Matthews, "There is a chance I'd vote for ." However, he later penned an
endorsement of incumbent President
George W. Bush in the pages of
The American Conservative.
Conservative U.S. senator
Bob Smith announced his switch from Republican to the U.S. Taxpayers Party in 1999 to seek its 2000 presidential nomination. Smith later claimed that anti-
New World Order ideologues within the party resisted his candidacy due to his
Roman Catholicism. He continued his campaign as a non-partisan independent but ceased the campaign soon after and returned to the Republican party to assume a Senate committee chairmanship. In 2008, he began writing editorials on the Constitution Party's web page, fueling speculation that he'd seek its presidential nomination again, although he'd endorsed Rep.
Duncan Hunter for the Republican nomination. He requested that his name be withheld from consideration in a March 2008 letter to CP supporters.
Minuteman Project co-founder
Jim Gilchrist ran for Congress with the
American Independent Party in 2005, but has since rejoined the Republicans.
Conservative author and
WorldNetDaily columnist
Jerome Corsi launched a brief campaign for the 2008 nomination but in
July 2007 decided to return to writing. Former Reagan Administration official and Christian conservative activist
Alan Keyes had actively sought the Constitution nod after ending a bid for the GOP nomination.
The party has also attracted notables in the anti-abortion violence movement such as
Patrick Johnston,
Lon Mabon,
Paul deParrie, and
Missionaries to the Preborn leader Pastor Matthew Trewhella. However, many such notables were involved in the below-mentioned disaffiliation efforts over abortion, and it remains unclear on what effect the movement has upon the current reorganized affiliates.
Platform
Fiscal policy
The Constitution Party supports reducing the role of the United States federal government through cutting
bureaucratic regulation, reducing spending, and replacing the
income tax with a
tariff-based revenue system supplemented by
excise taxes. Its leaders are among the strongest advocates of abolishing most forms of federal taxation, especially the
income tax; they view most current regular federal expenditures, such as those for
health care, education, and
welfare, as unconstitutional under and the
Tenth Amendment. The party also takes the position that the "imposition […] of Federal income, payroll, and estate taxes […] is an unconstitutional Federal assumption of direct taxing authority."
The party supports paying off the federal debt through a systematic elimination of further borrowing, programs, and agencies it considers unconstitutional such as the
Department of Education and the
Department of Health and Human Services. The party opposes foreign aid, asking that no further funds be appropriated for any kind of
foreign aid program, and encourage the idea that the United States terminate its participation in international lending institutions, such as the
World Bank,
International Monetary Fund, and the
Export-Import Bank. It also urges the government to immediately terminate all
subsidies, tax preferences, and investment guarantees that encourage U.S. businesses to invest in foreign property; and to seek to collect all
foreign debts owed to it.
Foreign policy
Additionally, the party favors a noninterventionist foreign policy. It advocates reduction and eventual elimination of the role the United States plays in multinational and international organizations such as the
United Nations, and favors withdrawal of the United States from most current treaties, such as
NAFTA,
GATT, and the
World Trade Organization. The party takes
mercantilist positions in supporting
protectionist policies on international
trade.
The party also believes in exercising a
tariff system to counteract the U.S.' increasingly negative
balance of trade. The tariff system would
levy additional
import costs, the amount of which would vary proportionally with how much less the exporting country's production costs are compared to that of U.S. companies. This system would presumably give U.S. companies a better chance at competing with countries, like
Mexico and
China, which have lower
labor costs.
Immigration policy
The party opposes
illegal immigration and also seeks a more restrictive policy on legal immigration. They demand that the federal government restore immigration policies based on the practice that potential immigrants will be disqualified from admission to the U.S. if, on the grounds of health, criminality, morals, or financial dependence, they'd impose an improper burden on the United States, any state, or any citizen of the United States.
Additionally, they oppose the provision of welfare subsidies and other taxpayer-supported benefits to illegal immigrants, and reject the practice of bestowing U.S. citizenship on children born to illegal immigrant parents while in this country. They also reject any extension of
amnesty to illegal immigrants. The Constitution Party calls for the use of U.S. troops to protect the states against an influx of illegal immigrants.
Social policy
The party is
pro-life and thus opposes
euthanasia and
abortion. The party supports a state's right to administer the
death penalty to those convicted of "
capital crimes" which, it should be noted, are not necessarily limited to
murder but usually equate to such in modern American society.
Our support of a State's option to impose the death penalty is limited to those who have been convicted of capital crimes. This is consistent with protecting "innocent" life because the death penalty would only be applied to those who have proven to be a threat to innocent life.
The party also opposes government recognition of
same-sex unions, and believes state and local governments have the right to criminalize "offensive sexual behavior". The party further opposes
pornography, believing the government needs to take a stand against it. Viewing gambling as destructive and contributing to crime, the party opposes legalized
gambling as well as government's support of gambling organizations. The party opposes federal anti-drug laws, in keeping with the spirit of and
Amendment 10, while maintaining that the federal government may have a role in limiting the import of drugs.
The party supports the right to bear arms and view the
Second Amendment to the Constitution as securing broad rights to own guns. The party is opposed to the
USA PATRIOT Act.
The party believes that charity is a private matter in which the government has no business being involved. The party opposes federal restrictions on, or subsidization of, medical treatments.
The party supports
English as the official language for all governmental business, opposes bilingual ballots, and insists that those who wish to take part in the electoral process and governance of the US be required to read and comprehend basic English as a precondition of citizenship.
Abortion stance and post-Tampa state disaffiliations
The Constitution Party officially opposes both early and late-term abortions. Party members, however, have been divided on the subject of exceptions in the cases of
rape,
incest, and abortions performed to save the life of the mother.
In early 2006, Christopher H. Hansen, the gubernatorial candidate of
Independent American Party of Nevada (the Constitution Party state affiliate in
Nevada), and candidates in
Colorado and
Idaho, publicly expressed support for these exceptions, which were contrary to the official Nevada platform.
At the party's April national convention in
Tampa, Florida, the assembly voted not to disaffiliate Nevada, citing that affiliate's official position on the issue and national party policy against dictating the internal affairs (such as electing leaders) of any affiliate. They also made it more difficult to introduce a disaffiliation resolution.
In response, nine state parties formally voted to disaffiliate from the national party, believing it to have unacceptably compromised on the issue of abortion. Several of these states have since reorganized and reaffiliated.
Federalism
The party supports the repeal of the
Sixteenth Amendment, which allows Congress to tax income, and the
Seventeenth Amendment, which requires the direct (popular) election of Senators. The party asserts the rights of states to
secede without interference from the Federal Government.
Ballot access
The Constitution Party is on the ballot in the following states, as of January 4, 2007 :
Ballot access only for Presidential candidate
Arkansas - The party collected 1,000 valid signatures (10,000 for party)
Presidential tickets
1992 - Howard Phillips and Albion Knight, Jr 43,369 Votes
1996 - Howard Phillips and Herb Titus 184,820 Votes
2000 - Howard Phillips and Curtis Frazier 98,022 Votes
2004 - Michael Peroutka and Chuck Baldwin 143,630 Votes
2008 - Chuck Baldwin and Darrell CastleFurther Information
Get more info on 'Constitution Party United States'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://constitution_party__united_states.totallyexplained.com">Constitution Party (United States) Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |